the good news about spit tobacco
The thing about running and walking (and I have an
incrementally higher run-to-walk ratio each time) is that you move both
literally and figuratively. I started out feeling grateful for a sunny morning;
the words Life is wonderful may have
actually formed in my head. A mile or so later I was teary, and the words It’s not fair, I didn’t do anything formed.
You know, just as a general rebuttal to The Man I’m constantly haggling with in
my mind.
By the time I looped around the York/Figueroa elbow and back
to Franklin High School, I saw three beefy looking guys, one of whom was
wearing what appeared to be a bullet-proof vest. Another was swinging a
sledgehammer. Is this one of those see
something/say something moments? I wondered. But I didn’t, and they made
their way onto campus.
Probably to fix something…right?
Two blocks later, I was thinking about an article posted by
Craig Santos Perez, about how processed salt contributes to various diseases.
When I read it, I simultaneously vowed to get more Michael Pollan-y in my
eating habits and felt irked that people’s reaction to most horrific
revelations is to look for some little personal habit we can take away to feel
better about ourselves. Eat less salt. Do weight-bearing exercise. Recycle.
Those things are worth doing, but if you truly believe that grinding
Himalayan salt into your pasta water instead of Morton’s is going to save you,
then you also sort of believe the reverse will give you an autoimmune disease,
right?
I left this comment on Craig’s Facebook page: “I think these types of studies should absolutely inform
cultural shifts and public policy decisions, but (as someone genetically
predisposed to self-blame) it’s important not to equate disease with personal
behavior. The folks I know with MS aren’t fast food junkies. As one prof in the
article says, ‘These are not diseases of bad genes alone or diseases caused by
the environment, but diseases of a bad interaction between genes and the
environment.’”
Then I proceeded to do nothing
toward changing public policy and very, very little toward changing culture.
So, I was thinking about personal
behavior vs. systemic change, and wondering who these mythical abdicators of
personal responsibility that Republicans are always complaining about actually are, because I’ve never met them, when I
saw this:
The Garbage Pail version would be Harry Tongue. |
I had so many questions: Did they
come in packs of chewing tobacco, some kind of novel Surgeon General’s Warning?
Or were they sold next to the
tobacco, like a sad six-pack of Near Beer?
I assume chewing tobacco is a real
problem—hence the cards—but I’ve never known anyone who’s chewed it. I live in
the wrong part of the country, I guess. So it’s hard to know whether these
scared-straight tactics would work, since they’re aimed at a totally foreign
species—people who would find stuffing their face like chipmunks and spitting
black saliva into a cup appealing in the first place.
The language of scared-straight
campaigns bugs me because it taps into all my early-childhood-based fears of
being eternally punished for the slightest slip-up. “Irreversible cancer,”
promises the Leukoplakia card. “Only surgery can stop it now.”
Okay, so cancer is not reversible
in the way that, say, diabetes is. But even the card admits it’s stoppable. If you have a nasty tumor on
your tongue, maybe you’ll have to “learn sign language” because “your tongue is
history,” but guess what, my cousin and her husband speak sign language
(because they’re deaf, not because they’re tobacco chewers) and they have a
really nice life. At least if the pictures from her son’s elementary school
graduation are any indication.
Scare tactics involve holding up
someone’s life as a cautionary tale, ignoring the secret that person knows: There’s life after you fall off the cliff.
It’s better and worse than you can imagine. No matter how much tobacco you
don’t chew, you will reach the edge of some cliff, and then you’ll be let in on
the secret.
Because tobacco chewers with
rotting teeth are known for their wisdom, right?
Comments
I think the scare tactics work better as preventatives.
Certainly worked for me with smoking so that I thought you'd have to be a fucking idiot to smoke by the time I hit middle school. This with parents who smoked (and eventually quit) and a brother who smokes (and quits and smokes again).
It's not that they didn't know it was bad for them, they were/are to varying degrees addicted. Dad stopped cold turkey one day. Mom took a few to several more years to stop.
My brother, well he is a fucking idiot because he started because his friends smoked. And since his wife does, he thinks, why bother if she doesn't stay on the wagon? Well, I can think of a lot of reasons, but whatever. I've stopped keeping track of whether they're smoking or not. It's like he didn't realize that tell-tale inhale was a dead giveaway even over the phone.
"I have an incrementally higher run-to-walk ratio each time"
Good for you! If I run/jog at all, it's short enough I count paces. 50-100 is better than none I figure.
("But if you truly believe that adding vitamin C to your diet is going to save you from scurvy, then you also sort of believe that lack of vitamin C will give you scurvy, right?" Right.)
Doesn't mean anyone deserves to get disease if they dip or don't eat they citrus or whatever--causation doesn't equal blame. I just don't think tobacco-related cancers are a functionally equivalent comparison to MS or other diseases with less abject environmental causation.
and more on the collectible chewing tobacco cards you found http://apackaday.blogspot.com/2008/09/2002-california-dept-of-health-not-your.html
http://www.tobaccofreecatalog.org/productdetails.aspx?id=5&itemno=J584
They appear aimed at youth baseball players.
Meanwhile, I think the tobacco cards and that Onion article actually work as great anti-obesity tactics, because I have kind of lost my appetite now. :-)