acting up
AK and I saw Dallas Buyers Club Sunday night, meaning I marked World AIDS Day by passively
absorbing information about AIDS in an entertaining format. Because I’m an activist like
that. I think it’s the first AIDS movie I’ve seen since Bio 40: AIDS and Other
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, a life sciences GE I took as a pass/fail my
senior year at UCLA. Every Friday was an optional class devoted to watching
movies about AIDS: Longtime Companion,
And the Band Played On, Philadelphia.
We were required to volunteer with AIDS organizations, so I
worked with PAWS (which helped HIV+ people keep their pets) and Project Angel Food. Movies and community work—that’s my kind of science class. (A big
part of the class was devoted to epidemiology too, which I actually found fascinating—a
combo of history and science—and I would totally be an epidemiologist today if
I weren’t a hypochondriac and if I understood things like nucleopeptides.)
Those experiences really stayed with me, if only because they nudged me that
much further toward coming out of the fucking closet.
Anyway, Dallas Buyers
Club. By one measurement, it’s sort of a Schindler’s List of AIDS movies. A rodeo cowboy/electrician
(Matthew McConaughey) who’s as opportunistic as any infection gets AIDS in 1985
and doesn’t have the luxury of waiting around for AZT trials, so he forms a
business importing better, less toxic drugs from other countries and selling
them to a “club” of fellow patients. He bucks the FDA, which has been paid off
by Big Pharma. In the process, he discovers that he cares about people,
including queers. He has his “I could have saved more” moment when he sells his
car to provide medicine for an impoverished patient he once dismissed.
On the other hand, McConaughey’s character is a minority
saving himself: a working-class man with AIDS who takes matters into his own
hands because no one else has anything to offer him. Not for the first or
second or third time, I felt grateful for my own advantages, not the least of
which is getting diagnosed with a disease that’s been around long enough to
have relatively uncontroversial treatments (I’m not counting alkaline-foods whackjobs).
Longtime Companion: The movie that made me realize I really like Blondie's "The Tide Is High." |
Now I wonder sometimes how much it would suck to be really
sick, facing an early and unfair death, and have to rely on some chirpy college
student who finds your tragedy romantic and exotic to deliver your lunch? It would
suck a lot, I think.
Don't you want these two in charge of your medical care? |
The movie is well written, well acted, economically edited,
with cleverly symbolic opening and closing rodeo scenes. It tells an
important and empowering story. But it’s still a movie about a straight white
man saving gay men (and the occasional woman). His queer business partner
(Jared Leto in very cute drag) gets to die tragically.
I think I finally get the Jordan Catalano thing. |
There’s a scene in which McConaughey, rail-thin and tethered
to an IV, staggers into some sort of hearing where doctors and FDA officials
are speaking about the benefits of AZT. He shouts what we now know to be true:
It killed the virus for a while, but it was toxic and didn’t save lives.
(My Bio 40 teacher chalked AZT up to panic—nearly everyone
was desperate to come up with a drug to fight AIDS. But it typically takes
about fifteen years to develop something that works against any disease—that’s just the nature of
scientific research. No surprise that protease inhibitors came on the market
along about 1995.)
If I’d been in that meeting, I would no doubt have dismissed
the delirious cowboy as an alkaline-foods whackjob. I’m a rule follower, if a
skeptical one. I don’t think science is untainted by capitalism, but I think
it’s the best we’ve got. But in that case, I would have been wrong. I would
have been better off (though perhaps only slightly) waiting outside
McConaughey’s dingy motel room for drugs smuggled from Mexico.
We need scientists. We need cowboys. We need what a woman I
recently interviewed called “citizen patients.” I’m trying to be one—though I’m
also trying to not be a patient at all—but it’s really confusing.
Comments
Your review is spot on--the Schindler's List of AIDS movies. But I really liked it for exactly the reason you note: we need citizen-patients (or even and also, "informed citizens who care about patients"). I felt the surging need for more civil disobedience with regards to FDA and their approval process and relationship to pharmaceutical companies. And I liked that the movie carried that message today.
(I'm guessing the answer is no, and that we just have to stay on top of the news and act when the occasion arises. No rest for the citizen patient/informed ally!)